DSB (Austria) · 6 October 2023
newspaper company (first controller) and broadcasting company (second controller)
About: Data principles, Data subject rights, Transparency, Unlawful processing
What happened next. Confirmed in court: the Federal Administrative Court rejected all the appeals (6 June 2024). Source →
FineNo fineConfirmed in court
- Regulator
- DSB (Austria)
- Decided
- 6 October 2023
- Country
- Austria
- Sector
- Not given
- Regulator’s reference
- DSB-D124.5337
- Fino case number
- 2023/AT/027
What happened
The DPA held that the media reporting on a leaked file containing PCR test results of several thousand individuals, and the non-disclosure of the source are protected by the journalistic privilege.
Summary from GDPRhub (noyb), written by its volunteers, not by Fino. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Rules involved
- Art. 5Principles relating to processing of personal data5(1)(b)Read →
- Art. 6Lawfulness of processing6(1) · 6(1)(f)Read →
- Art. 12Transparent information, communication and modalities for the exercise of the rights of the data subject12(3) · 12(4)Read →
- Art. 15Right of access by the data subject15(1) · 15(1)(g) · 15(3)Read →
- Art. 17Right to erasure (‘right to be forgotten’)17(1) · 17(3) · 17(3)(a) · 17(3)(e)Read →
- Art. 58Powers58(2)(c)Read →
- Data principles
- Data subject rights
- Transparency
- Unlawful processing
Sources
The facts on this page come from the sources above, as they recorded them. Nothing has been estimated or filled in. Not legal advice.
Spotted a mistake? Write to angelillolorenzo@gmail.com and quote 2023/AT/027.