APD/GBA (Belgium) · 21 February 2023
Public authority
Name not published.
About: Accountability, Consent, Data principles, Data protection officer, Transparency, Unlawful processing
- Regulator
- APD/GBA (Belgium)
- Decided
- 21 February 2023
- Country
- Belgium
- Sector
- Not given
- Regulator’s reference
- 15/2023
- Fino case number
- 2023/BE/010
What happened
A public authority can rely on Article 6(1)(e) to geo-locate the company cars of its employees since there were no less invasive alternatives and tracking was necessary for an efficient usage of its limited resources. In this case, the controller was however reprimanded for several other breaches of the GDPR.
Summary from GDPRhub (noyb), written by its volunteers, not by Fino. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Rules involved
- Art. 4Definitions4(11)Read →
- Art. 5Principles relating to processing of personal data5(1) · 5(1)(a) · 5(2)Read →
- Art. 6Lawfulness of processing6(1) · 6(1)(a)Read →
- Art. 7Conditions for consent7(1) · 7(3)Read →
- Art. 12Transparent information, communication and modalities for the exercise of the rights of the data subject12(1) · 12(6)Read →
- Art. 13Information to be provided where personal data are collected from the data subject13(1) · 13(2)Read →
- Art. 14Information to be provided where personal data have not been obtained from the data subject14(1) · 14(2)Read →
- Art. 24Responsibility of the controller24(1) · 24(2)Read →
- Art. 25Data protection by design and by default25(1)Read →
- Art. 30Records of processing activities30(1)(a)Read →
- Art. 38Position of the data protection officer38(3)Read →
- Accountability
- Consent
- Data principles
- Data protection officer
- Transparency
- Unlawful processing
Sources
The facts on this page come from the sources above, as they recorded them. Nothing has been estimated or filled in. Not legal advice.
Spotted a mistake? Write to angelillolorenzo@gmail.com and quote 2023/BE/010.