Datatilsynet (Denmark) · Date not published
Familieretshuset
About: Data breach, Data security, Processor obligations
FineNo fineViolation found
- Regulator
- Datatilsynet (Denmark)
- Decided
- Date not published
- Country
- Denmark
- Sector
- Not given
- Regulator’s reference
- 2020-432-0037
- Fino case number
- ND/DK/010
What happened
The Danish DPA (Datatilsynet) found the Family Court in violation of Articles 32(1) and 28(3) due to excessive human and technical errors resulting in leakage of personal data - including many with address protection - and incomplete/lacking data processor agreements.
Summary from GDPRhub (noyb), written by its volunteers, not by Fino. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Rules involved
- Art. 28Processor28(3)Read →
- Art. 32Security of processing32(1)Read →
- Art. 33Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authorityRead →
- Data breach
- Data security
- Processor obligations
Sources
The facts on this page come from the sources above, as they recorded them. Nothing has been estimated or filled in. Not legal advice.
Spotted a mistake? Write to angelillolorenzo@gmail.com and quote ND/DK/010.