DSB (Austria) · 14 November 2025
Friederike N.
About: Data subject rights, Transparency
FineNo fineViolation found
- Regulator
- DSB (Austria)
- Decided
- 14 November 2025
- Country
- Austria
- Sector
- Not given
- Regulator’s reference
- 2025-0.923.556
- Fino case number
- 2025/AT/030
What happened
The DPA held that a court-appointed psychologist can act as a controller and found a violation of Article 12(3) GDPR because the psychologist failed to respond to a data subject's access request without informing about the reasons for inaction.
Summary from GDPRhub (noyb), written by its volunteers, not by Fino. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Rules involved
- Art. 4Definitions4(7)Read →
- Art. 12Transparent information, communication and modalities for the exercise of the rights of the data subject12(3) · 12(4)Read →
- Art. 15Right of access by the data subject15(1) · 15(4)Read →
- Art. 58Powers58(2)(c)Read →
- Data subject rights
- Transparency
Sources
The facts on this page come from the sources above, as they recorded them. Nothing has been estimated or filled in. Not legal advice.
Spotted a mistake? Write to angelillolorenzo@gmail.com and quote 2025/AT/030.